<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran Produces HEU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu</link>
	<description>an ACW Network site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hass</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>hass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>Iran has been blocked from purchasing the required fuel for the reactor interntionally. So, why should it not try to make its own fuel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran has been blocked from purchasing the required fuel for the reactor interntionally. So, why should it not try to make its own fuel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yale Simkin</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Yale Simkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>Hairs, yes I was being ironic, altho I disingenously claimed otherwise &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1462/total-wonkerr-doubts-3000-centrifuge-reports-rocks-out&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hairs, yes I was being ironic, altho I disingenously claimed otherwise <a href="http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1462/total-wonkerr-doubts-3000-centrifuge-reports-rocks-out" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8924</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8924</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey,

	I&#8217;m not sure about the difference between Russian and US measurements, but it could be as simple as atom % vs weight %.  The two are slightly different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m not sure about the difference between Russian and US measurements, but it could be as simple as atom % vs weight %.  The two are slightly different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hairs</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>Hairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>&#8220;This will allow them to claim that they are absolutely &lt;strong&gt;kosher&lt;/strong&gt;&#8230;&#8221; 

	I&#8217;m not sure if your joke was intended or not Yale, but thanks anyway &#8211; claiming that their production is halal just wouldn&#8217;t have the same ring to it! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This will allow them to claim that they are absolutely <strong>kosher</strong>&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>	I&#8217;m not sure if your joke was intended or not Yale, but thanks anyway &#8211; claiming that their production is halal just wouldn&#8217;t have the same ring to it! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hairs</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8922</link>
		<dc:creator>Hairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8922</guid>
		<description>At the risk of stating the obvious, maybe the announcement is just a large smokescreen.

	Up to a few days ago if the inspectors had found any uranium enriched to around 20% then suspicions would have been raised that secret, &#8220;bomb related&#8221; work was going on. Now if anything is found, the Iranians just say, &#8220;Yeah, well we told you &#8211; so what&#8217;s the secret?&#8221; After all, lab tests are exquisitely sensitive at telling us about what the level of enrichment is, but not half so good as saying &lt;strong&gt;when&lt;/strong&gt; it was enriched, or &lt;strong&gt;where&lt;/strong&gt;.

	It seems very suspicious to me that the first batch of ca. 20% enrichment was produced so quickly &#8211; almost as if the Iranians were concerned that a 20% enriched particle would be found somewhere in the near future, and they wouldn&#8217;t be able to explain it. Now, though, it&#8217;s perfectly explicable.

	Of course, political shenanigans may be the primary driver of what&#8217;s happening, but the time between announcing the 20% enrichment target and (seemingly) achieving it does seem mighty short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of stating the obvious, maybe the announcement is just a large smokescreen.</p>
<p>	Up to a few days ago if the inspectors had found any uranium enriched to around 20% then suspicions would have been raised that secret, &#8220;bomb related&#8221; work was going on. Now if anything is found, the Iranians just say, &#8220;Yeah, well we told you &#8211; so what&#8217;s the secret?&#8221; After all, lab tests are exquisitely sensitive at telling us about what the level of enrichment is, but not half so good as saying <strong>when</strong> it was enriched, or <strong>where</strong>.</p>
<p>	It seems very suspicious to me that the first batch of ca. 20% enrichment was produced so quickly &#8211; almost as if the Iranians were concerned that a 20% enriched particle would be found somewhere in the near future, and they wouldn&#8217;t be able to explain it. Now, though, it&#8217;s perfectly explicable.</p>
<p>	Of course, political shenanigans may be the primary driver of what&#8217;s happening, but the time between announcing the 20% enrichment target and (seemingly) achieving it does seem mighty short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schilling</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>A cascade, in this case, probably means 164 P-1 centrifuges, previously estimated here at 0.87 kg-SWU/yr capacity.  Assuming the Iranians use existing 3.5% LEU as feedstock, and are willing to lose 50% of the U-235 to the tails (which can be fed right back into one of the many other cascades, of course), it would take them just about two weeks to produce 1 kg of 20% LEU.    

	Assuming 24/7 operation and not counting setup time.  I suspect that once the Iranians get a cascade set up properly, they probably can run it close to 24/7 for at least a few weeks straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cascade, in this case, probably means 164 P-1 centrifuges, previously estimated here at 0.87 kg-SWU/yr capacity.  Assuming the Iranians use existing 3.5% LEU as feedstock, and are willing to lose 50% of the U-235 to the tails (which can be fed right back into one of the many other cascades, of course), it would take them just about two weeks to produce 1 kg of 20% LEU.    </p>
<p>	Assuming 24/7 operation and not counting setup time.  I suspect that once the Iranians get a cascade set up properly, they probably can run it close to 24/7 for at least a few weeks straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wise</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8920</link>
		<dc:creator>wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8920</guid>
		<description>I saw in the Farsi article that the level was 19.75%. The orginal reactor was delivered with Weopens grade but was modified to work with 19.75% a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw in the Farsi article that the level was 19.75%. The orginal reactor was delivered with Weopens grade but was modified to work with 19.75% a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yale Simkin</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8919</link>
		<dc:creator>Yale Simkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8919</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I suspect that the Iranians will produce an &lt;em&gt;end&lt;/em&gt; product that is &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt;, but not quite 20% and not round it up. This will allow them to claim that they are absolutely kosher in only producing (in what they claim is their right) legal LEU, yet at the same time they will demonstrate that they are competently &lt;em&gt;capable&lt;/em&gt; of producing HEU, which magically comes into existence by going from 19.999999999% to 20.0%.

	This way they get the best of all worlds.

	Although the may produce &gt;20% hex due to imprecision in enrichment they will downblend as Carey pointed out and the IAEA will eagerly give them a pass on the overlimit trace samples.

	I personally don&#8217;t get freaked by Iran enriching to almost 20% &#8211; except for their desire to be provocative.

	I already passed freaked when they produced 3.5% LEU.

	Seventy percent of the heavy lifting in enriching nat-U to LEU is already in the can.  It is only a bit longer going from 3.5 to 90% rather than from 20% to 90%. The difference is in weeks not years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I suspect that the Iranians will produce an <em>end</em> product that is <em>almost</em>, but not quite 20% and not round it up. This will allow them to claim that they are absolutely kosher in only producing (in what they claim is their right) legal LEU, yet at the same time they will demonstrate that they are competently <em>capable</em> of producing HEU, which magically comes into existence by going from 19.999999999% to 20.0%.</p>
<p>	This way they get the best of all worlds.</p>
<p>	Although the may produce &#062;20% hex due to imprecision in enrichment they will downblend as Carey pointed out and the IAEA will eagerly give them a pass on the overlimit trace samples.</p>
<p>	I personally don&#8217;t get freaked by Iran enriching to almost 20% &#8211; except for their desire to be provocative.</p>
<p>	I already passed freaked when they produced 3.5% LEU.</p>
<p>	Seventy percent of the heavy lifting in enriching nat-U to LEU is already in the can.  It is only a bit longer going from 3.5 to 90% rather than from 20% to 90%. The difference is in weeks not years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George William Herbert</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8918</link>
		<dc:creator>George William Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8918</guid>
		<description>Bts asks:
&lt;em&gt;Is it even possible to make 1 kg 20% LEU in 1 day using only one cascade? or is this more like 10 mg?&lt;/em&gt;

	Less than that, even.  Calutrons have a very high separative ratio per pass, and get you small quantities of pure material immediately.  Centrifuge cascades (and gaseous diffusion cascades, etc) have to establish the enrichment gradient across the cascade before any useful output happens.  That&#8217;s part of the system start up period.  Before the gradient is established nothing is coming out at the eventual target enrichment, though you may be taking a dump quantity off the top to establish the flow volume which the gradient will eventually support.  You can re-feed that dump back into the input, as the enrichment slowly ramps up off the top end&#8230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bts asks:<br />
<em>Is it even possible to make 1 kg 20% LEU in 1 day using only one cascade? or is this more like 10 mg?</em></p>
<p>	Less than that, even.  Calutrons have a very high separative ratio per pass, and get you small quantities of pure material immediately.  Centrifuge cascades (and gaseous diffusion cascades, etc) have to establish the enrichment gradient across the cascade before any useful output happens.  That&#8217;s part of the system start up period.  Before the gradient is established nothing is coming out at the eventual target enrichment, though you may be taking a dump quantity off the top to establish the flow volume which the gradient will eventually support.  You can re-feed that dump back into the input, as the enrichment slowly ramps up off the top end&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bts</title>
		<link>http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/2624/iran-produces-heu#comment-8917</link>
		<dc:creator>bts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armscontrolwonk.com/?p=2624#comment-8917</guid>
		<description>Is it even possible to make 1 kg 20% LEU in 1 day using only one cascade? or is this more like 10 mg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it even possible to make 1 kg 20% LEU in 1 day using only one cascade? or is this more like 10 mg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

