Some time ago, I came across a funny story — did you know Taiwan tried to disguise cruise missile deployments as delivery trucks? Guess how well it worked? Well, you’re reading about it here, aren’t you?
The story was actually reported in near real time in Taiwan. But I’ve never see a full write up of the cruise missile and the deployment fiasco. So, I thought I’d write the rare blog post and do a podcast.
The HF-2E Land Attack Cruise Missile
For many years, Taiwan was reportedly interested in developing long-range missiles that could strike targets in China. Reports of the notional ballistic missile used names like Tien Ma (天馬) and Tien Chi (天戟) to describe a long-range ballistic missile that would be developed by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology based on the Tien Kung SAM technology.
As best I can tell, Tien Ma was a real program that started in the 1980s, but ”never got off the drawing board” and was canceled in the early 1990s. At least that is what a senior engineer who worked on the program told Defense News‘s Wendell Minnick. There were also reports of something called the Tien Chi in the early 2000s, but noting solid. One US official told Minnick in November 2003 that “There is a lot of smoke, but no real fire yet.”
That’s because, as Dennis Gormley might have predicted, the Taiwanese were investing in a new 600 km-range land-attack cruise missile called the HF-2E. The name is misleading since Taiwan has an Hsiung Feng (雄風) series of anti-ship cruise missile. But as best I can tell, the HF-2E does not share a common technology lineage with the HF-2 and HF-3 missiles. (There are reports of other names for the HF-2E like Chi Sun. There are also reports that Taiwan is developing a 1200 km-range cruise missile called Yun Feng 雲風 or Cloud Peak. Its hard to keep them all straight and some of this stuff might be vaporware.)
At this point, Taiwan has announced one LACM that goes by the name HF-2E, although there are reports of longer-range variants under development. The National Air and Space Intelligence Center helpfully confirmed the existence of the missile in the 2013 edition of Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat. Michael Tsai described, a former ROC Defense Minister, has also described the missile in very general terms, including a February 2008 test, in his book God Bless Taiwan.
By the way, Taiwan was going to show off the HF-2E at a 10/10 parade in 2007, but a leaked cable suggest the striped pants cookie pushers at AIT scotched the idea. Killjoys! (There are also reports that the US really tried to kill the program by denying technology transfers to CSIST.)
So, we’re left to guess at what the HF-2E looks like. On the outside.
Despite having not seen a nice picture of the missile, we may have pictures of the engine. Surprising, right?
Two sets of images of an engine that is probably for the HF-2E have appeared. This engine bears more than a passing resemblance to the turbofan engine that powers the US Tomahawk missile. I haven’t been able to determine the exhibition or who took the pictures of the first set of images, but a second pair of images was part of a press conference by CSIST, where it seems an official explicitly said it was for the HF-2E. You can see the little CSIST “trident” logo on the display.
It ought to be possible to make some guesses about the capability of the system using the image of the engine, but I am pretty busy right now. It’s on my list, but I wouldn’t be sad if someone beat me to it.
Now for the really fun part. I’ve seen reports that Taiwan may produce up to 500 HF-2E missiles. According to Minnick, the missiles were deployed in three squadrons under the 601 Group. In January 2013, Minnick published the lat/long for the three squadrons deployed HF-2E cruise missiles, spotting launchers in the open at two sites:
* Missile Command Headquarters | Taishan, Taipei County | 25°02’13.59″N, 121°25’14.90″E
* CSIST Site | Sanxia, Taipei County | 24°54’10.41″N, 121°21’17.18″E
* Former Nike SAM site | Yangmei, Taoyuan County | 24°54’07.14″N, 121°07’05.27″E
Pretty quickly, a blogger using the handle Hojiyi correlated the bases to images, apparently circulating on the Mobile01 forum, of apparently military vehicles painted to look like civilian ones such as delivery trucks. Here is one image Hojiyi created.
I haven’t been able to find the images at Mobile01; I suspect they may have been deleted. But too late!
The truck isn’t really all that well disguised. It looks a lot like a known ROC missile launcher — notice the similarities in the chassis compared to an HF-3 launcher. They are not identical, but they clearly bear a family resemblance.
The similarities are more pronounced when compared to real delivery vehicles used by FedEx, DHL and other delivery services in Taiwan. Real delivery trucks tend to be smaller, commercially-available vehicles (Isuzu is a popular brand) that are marked with advertising information such as a website address or telephone number. You know, in case you wanted to use the service.
After the blogger’s analysis, a reporter from United Daily News tried to look the company up. Nothing. A guy running a betel nut stand — a nice bit of local Taiwanese color — told the reporter he always wondered why there were suddenly delivery trucks all over his relatively quiet neighborhood.
The Taiwan Defense Ministry no commented the United Daily news story (see comments), but an anonymous Taiwanese defense official told Minnick the idea was “idiotic” and “embarrassing.”
The Missile Command site, one of the deployment locations, is pretty amusing. Here is a view of the front gate. You can see the Nike-Hercules missiles on display from the street. You don’t have to guess what sort of base this is, thanks to the historical collection.
The picture that Hojiyi posted online from this base wasn’t the greatest. Here is a better image. You can clearly see the white cabs that are apparently painted to look civilian. Other vehicles are tarped up.
Moreover, this deployment yard was built in 2009, which coincides perfectly with public reporting about the deployment of the HF-2E. The Taiwan Defense Ministry may have no commented the stories, but in 2013 they confirmed them — they covered the lot to make it harder to see who was home. Here are three images from 2012, 2013 and 2014. Now you see them, now you don’t.
Of course, now by then it was too late. They might as well have painted “SECRET LACM DEPLOYMENT SITE” on the roof, in simplified characters.
One can see the same kind of construction to cover the LACM deployment area at Yangmei. There was less change at Sanxia, but perhaps that site was always covered up. Minnick didn’t see any launchers out in the open at that site. If I had to guess, I’d focus on the covered vehicle sheds at: 24°54’13.63″N, 121°21’25.47″E.
The big take away is that it is pretty dumb, in this day and age, to try to disguise ground-launched cruise missile launchers as delivery trucks. It’s hard to make a fake that is convincing enough to fool everyone. Sure, lots of people wouldn’t notice, but someone will and then they’ll buzzing about it online. (Ask the Office of Secure Transportation.) Once Minnick reported that Taiwan had deployed the HF-2E to specific sites, someone like Hojiyi was bound to put two and two together.
The legend didn’t survive the slightest scrutiny by a reporter who quickly confirmed that “Red Bird Express” wasn’t a real company.
Still, this probably isn’t the last we’ve heard of such ideas. The Russians market the Klub-K in a nifty, hard-to-identify shipping container. And our friends at the Oryx blog have noted the Syrian Arab Army’s preference for Mercedes trucks when hauling missiles around. But what the Taiwan case illustrates is that concealing a missile deployment requires a lot more work than simply adding livery to a military vehicle. In the modern era, where it is tremendously easy to snap a picture with your camera phone and there share it with thousands of people, Defense Ministries are going to have to try a lot harder than this.
Well, I guess the upside is that Taiwan can include the HF-2E in the next 10/10 parade.
Hmmm. Seems legit.